David Thomas- The Mind Of A Man

During persuasive report pieces authors try to cause you come crosswise their microscope st come on of diorama as valid. Often times during this process, their writing is agreed by the errors they make to levy their advert. David doubting Thomas makes some(prenominal) errors in his judge The Mind of a Man. In his dissertation he tries to dig up that women atomic function 18 non smarter than men as previously believed, al un ascertained rather that they vertical go by at different tasks. However, end-to-end his entirely try on, he describes that boys are discouraged by young-bearing(prenominal) teachers and does not stick to his thesis. He fork overed a biased ap acme of view that he support with only anecdotic license and studies that contained no metrical composition or statistics. withal, his use of feeling in his taste showed his passion towards others views that contradicted his.         David Thomas relieve oneselfs a bias ed point of view in his endeavor. Throughout m any(prenominal) parts of the probe he describes the stereotypes about boys, stating their difficulty to learn properly as a resolving power of these stereotypes by often using anecdotal evidence. He describes the impose grades boys were getting than girls on the GCSE exams and makes the assumption, The introduction of bod work into the GCSE syllabus appears to favor girls, who tend to be alert and less(prenominal)(prenominal) rebellious, which has not been develop out, or could not be potency up by any sort of statistical or itemual information from studies. He makes this statement assuming that the tail must be that girls receive high grades because the test kicking upstairs them. He does not take into the friendship that by chance the boys vindicatory didnt do as rise for a issue of other drives that has nothing to do with the way the tests were designed. In the essay, he continues to show his biased p oint of view by quoting Tony Mooney, a supp! lementary school headmaster, who reinforces his point give tongue to boys are less ripe than girls because women teachers favor girls and do not reinforce boys because of their fast-growing(a) and approximative behavior. Thomas adds this quote that has no factual evidence, it is the judgement of a school headmaster, who surely cannot be present normal in every single class to know everything thats sledding on. Thomas quotes Mooneys son, who showed a balance in his marks when taught by a woman, Because the men teachers never shout at me as lots as the woman teachers is another form of anecdotal evidence. This is the notion of one little boy who cannot be compared to community as a whole (222).         Thomas continues to try and prove his point by adding studies without any statistics in them and in turn makes many contradictions to things previously mentioned in his essay. He includes a involve make at the University of California in which 72 boys and 60 girls at kindergarten level learned how to hit the books with a machine. When well-tried, the girls tally were less than the boys scores. Then, when they went back to normal instruction by women teachers, they were tested once again later and the boys scored less than the girls. As enkindle as these results may be, they do not contain number to show how queen-size the difference actually was. The difference could be minimal which could be due to a number of reasons. So, the fact that no statistical evidence was included with the study did not prove to be that convincing (223). Also, in the beginning of the essay, he states that women film been proven to be better at oral tasks, which would explain the reason why they didnt do as well with the machines as the teachers. So he contradicts himself entering this study by previously cover why a girl exponent have do better on these tests (221). Thomas uses a lot of emotion in his essay to prove his point, specifi cally when he talks about the quote he employ from ! Christine Cosker who calculateed to disprove one of his earlier quotes by Mooney. She said, If girls achieve higher standards than boys, it is not the result of sympathetic distaff teachers: it is that boys fail to be motivated because of their spot to women. Boys early experience is almost integrally one of a society which regards womens traditional roles as trivial, tire and second-rate and dismisses their opinions. If girls have a positive role assume in the young-bearing(prenominal) teacher, they will do better than boys. But if boys, unencumbered by societys prejudices, valued their female teachers, then their progress would match that of girls(223). ostensibly Cosker felt strongly about her point and be an preference explanation to Mooneys as well as Thomas possibility of female teachers being the cause of the boys lower grades. Thomas uses jeering as well to make his anger known. In reception to her earn, he states Heaven forbid that they [boys] should be given any thoughtfulness or compassion. Heaven forbid that the prejudices of the new age should be challenged. If you ever doubted that feminists have taken over from apoplectic disused colonels as the great reactionaries of society, just read this letter(224).

If you read betwixt the lines of his sarcasm, you begin to see just what he is implying. He is implying that she didnt give boys any compassion or consideration when she was apparently stating that if the boys learned to appreciate their teachers much and see them as more of a role model it would work towards their advantage. He continues to assault her different point of view by stating them as a feminists point of view. In his efforts to try to make concourse take ! his side and believe his thoughts he just discredits himself because instead of embrace the possibility of other causes he simply knocks them protrude and states that they are just plain and simply wrong.         Thomas consistence paragraphs and close were not connected substantially to the main point of his essay. In his thesis, he used a quote from Dr. John Nicholson saying that the IQ scores from men and women were indistinguishable (221), and the only difference is that they were just better at different sort of tasks. Meanwhile, his whole entire essay attacked the fact that female teachers dont support the boys and that caused their lower grades. So the information he provided did not support his thesis. Also he ends the conclusion with a strange statement that seem to signify a new thesis. His concluding sentence, When Yoda sat on his reel in The Empire Strikes Back and told Luke Skywalker that he had to tell apart between the dark force and the light, he knew what he was public lecture about (225), seemed to make little sense and had nothing to do with his essay. In writing his essay, he shouldve considered his audience and that some people who did not see the movie would not understand what he was implying, anyways that statement seemed more like an opening line preferably a than a concluding one.         In gild for authors to make you see their point of view as valid, they sometimes compromise the intensity level of their information. David Thomas did many things to compromise his believability in his essay The Mind of a Man. In Thomas essay he had a biased view that he supported with anecdotal evidence. He used studies with no real number or statistics to control them. His use of emotion in his essay showed his anger towards others views that contradicted his. Also, his body paragraphs and conclusion didnt seem to be connected to the initial thesis he stated. If you want to get a full essay, order it! on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.