"Anna Karenina" by Leo Tolstoy

In Leo Tolstoys Anna K atomic number 18nina, the characters of Levin and Anna are devoured by their doubts and their inability to get along heart from their lives. Their means of dealing with this existential doubt differ, however. Where Anna sees her purport as a novel, a structured series of events that has form and in which she is in the hands of fate, Levin grapples with his inability to find each form at all to the dis dictateed, and seemingly meaningless constitution of his life which he nevertheless lives in a obdurate and single-minded fashion. Tolstoy implies by Levin, that though we would like to attribute the qualities we refer to device to our experience lives, because they are comforting and fanciful, they are contradictory and misleading. tour the outlooks of these two characters differ, they resemble each other in their decisive truthfulness. As the protagonists of the book, their approaches in dealing with their fate are place in their final inner mon ologues, the contrasting of which is the function of this essay. Tolstoy illustrates, through the destructive nature of Annas act, and the elation experienced by Levin at his epiphany, the danger of ascribing poetic importance to ones own life.

Conceiving of ones own life, as one looks at a narrative, fated by omens and foreign forces, is not only narcissistic and selfish, but sham; whereas fetching control of ones life to do good is distinguished and meaningful. Annas (and closely young peoples) ideology of life is that it is only sincerely lived when it is roughly intense. Tolstoy disagrees with this and confronts it with the idea that, in the words of Gary Morson, life is lived in the sensitive and ordinary moments. It i! s both prosaic and undramatic (Morson p. 73) at the alike(p) time. This is clear from the... If you want to get a full essay, methodicalness it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay