Essay on the connection between literature and life

Hence, in sophisticated times, our designing of the depth of writings is not connect to this doctrine of unremitting truths. We try quite a to understand the forces can buoy these amicable changes. consequently with regard to books, our ideas of its prise depends on the conclusion to which is has been able to testify the changing conditions of social demeanor. Great publications of all time grasps and reflects these truths of manner that emerge victorious out of the ruins of the past. lit is great because of its universality. It does not guide with the particular(prenominal) nine of a particular friendship but with society as a whole or in its entirety. For this reason, the lit that assemblingight-emitting diode to the people with the spoken record book had a great appeal than that which appeals through with(predicate) the written wordwhich whitethorn not pass along all men. The recited epics of Homer, the acted plays of Shakespe ar, the cantillate song s of Chandidas or the common reading of Mangala Kavya had a more encompassing appeal than our red-brick poets and novelists who express solitary(prenominal) segments of social behavior. poesy that expresses intensely idiosyncratic views and sentiments, novels that depict the courtesy of a exceptional sort out of fellowship or deal with highly specialise problems, cannot surely be of the same direct as are Tulsidass Ramcharitmanas or Kritibass Ramayana, which had and politic grant a mass appeal. This led Aristotle to affirm that the appropriate subject of poesy is human action. The cut back appeal of modern literature resulted from the dependence of writers on the underpin of high-born persons. Necessarily much(prenominal) writers had to produce engage that would appeal to their patrons primarily. As a result, their persist became limited; Chaucer was a much richer artificer; his insight into life was also great(p); but he lacked the spontaneity, the range, the popular appeal of the ballad-writers, that of the ballads of Mymansingha Gitika. \nModern writers have developed a flair for expression, timbers and detail that are sagacious and complex in destination, Wordsworth realized this and advocated that verse line should be the language of common speech, the heightened speech of the rustics. The more literature is free from its class limitations, and set outs the vehicle of the thoughts and feeling of the common man, the functional people, the more result it tend to become popular and public. lit mast has social functions. graphics for arts sake, pursuit of subtle beauty through art, the creation of a literary or artists masterpiece as an end in itselfare now go into disfavor. Great literature must(prenominal) always serve the impoverishment of the people. It must vocalization their inmost desires, their noblest aspirations. In the second place, by drawing the worry of the people to the emergent truths of life, literature s hould attract the people forward-moving to a high plane of life and thought. That is what Walt Whitman meant when he verbalize that the object of literature is to free, arouse and amplify the human heed. Literature, in this sense, must emancipate the reason from its limitations; arouse it to a consciousness of the can-do urge of life. \n